Home News Country Specific Resolutions contrary to UN Charter ; UNHRC cannot defy it –  MFA Minister

Country Specific Resolutions contrary to UN Charter ; UNHRC cannot defy it –  MFA Minister

0
Country Specific Resolutions contrary to UN Charter ; UNHRC cannot defy it –  MFA Minister
The Human Rights Council cannot act contrary to the UN Charter and that according to the UN Charter, they cannot select individual countries as they wish and make accusations against them, Minister of Foreign Affairs Dinesh Gunawardena said.
He mentioned this in a media conference held at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs yesterday, 23rd March 2021, to brief the media on the outcome of the 46th Regular Session of the United Nations Human Rights Council sessions in Geneva.
The Minister further stated that Sri Lanka rejected the report of the Commissioner for Human Rights against Sri Lanka, which was considered as the basis in composing the Resolution which was passed in the Council yesterday, pointing out that the report contained baseless statistics and misinformation.
Minister Gunawardena said that only 22 out of the 47 member states of the UNHRC have voted in favour of the resolution against Sri Lanka which was brought in by the UN Core Group and that they have lost the majority since the brought up resolution is contrary to that basic policy of the United Nations.
The resolution on Sri Lanka was adopted at the UNHRC in Geneva yesterday with 22 voting for, 11 against it and 14 abstentions.
China, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Philippines, Russia, Somalia, Uzbekistan, and Venezuela are among the countries that voted against the resolution.
Minister Dinesh Gunawardena stated that it is a victory for Sri Lanka that only 22 of the 47 member states of the UNHRC have voted in favour of the resolution against Sri Lanka.
He described the countries which voted in favour of the resolution as “countries of dominant ideology.”
Below is the Minister’s statement at the media briefing;
“The people have voted to elect Gotabaya Rajapaksa as the President of the country with an overwhelming majority and then the majority has voted to form a strong government for him. The previous government had co-sponsored and passed these resolutions at the Geneva Human Rights Conference to put our country in a dangerous situation.
After the election of our Government in 2019, we participated in the 43rd Human Rights Council and withdrew from that co-sponsorship. There, we said that we would abide by the constitution of our country. We have been working accordingly ever since.
Today the whole world is plagued by the COVID pandemic. More than a hundred countries are distressed by the inability to get the vaccine. At such a time, the primary responsibility of the Human Rights Council should be to rescue the people affected by the COVID pandemic and keep them alive. We have stated this at the conference.
We completely rejected the report of the Commissioner for Human Rights against us, pointing out that the report contained baseless statistics and misinformation. We also call on the member states of the Human Rights Council to oppose the resolution. The Human Rights Council cannot act contrary to the UN Charter. They cannot act contrary to the original proposal for establishing the Human Rights Council. According to the UN Charter, they cannot select individual countries as they wish and make accusations against them.
Only 22 out of the 47 member states of the UNHRC have voted in favour of the resolution against our country which was brought in contrary to that basic policy, by the countries including Britain, Germany, Canada and several other countries. As a result, they have lost the majority. It has defeated the attempt to control the South or the hard-won independence of the colonial countries, by the North. Especially the President, the Prime Minister, our government and those important ones who love the country got together and made the world aware of this. None of us got to attend this conference due to the COVID pandemic.
We are committed to defending the sovereignty and freedom of our country and defeating the resolution against us, despite of their holding virtual conferences and influencing countries like our’s. As we promised then, a Presidential Commission headed by a Supreme Court Judge has been appointed to investigate human rights violations and its work is continuing. We are working to make the 2030 Sustainable Development Plan declared by the United Nations a success. We have also created an environment where any Sinhalese, Tamil or Muslim living in our country can travel, live and settle anywhere from Point Pedro to Dondra Head.
Today, the country has been transformed into a country that protects the civil rights destroyed by the LTTE terrorists. The resolution against us by several countries including Britain excluding these positive points could not get a majority but only 22 votes. Also, 11 votes have been cast against the resolution. 14 countries have abstained from voting for the British resolutions. Accordingly, 25 out of 47 countries have not agreed with this resolution. That is very important.”

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here