Jayawardene had been invited to play a role in Sri Lanka's World Cup campaign,
but declined largely because he remains disillusioned with Sri Lanka Cricket's
Now a two-time
IPL-winning coach, Jayawardene has in the past produced plans to overhaul Sri
Lanka's domestic cricket system, only for those proposals to be rejected by
SLC. Last year, a committee featuring Jayawardene, Kumara
Sangakkara and Aravinda de Silva had also produced a report on
Sri Lankan cricket, with recommendations on governance as well as domestic
structure. Those recommendations have been almost totally ignored since.
he had been asked twice to play a role in Sri Lanka's backroom for the World
Cup - once by Sri Lanka's sports minister, and once by SLC's CEO towards the
end of the recent IPL. He turned the offers down.
"I was [invited]
but I have several other commitments. More than that, I didn't understand the
role I am expected to play," Jayawardene told Sunday
Times. "There's no point in me getting involved tactically, or
whatever, if I don't have a say in the whole structure. The team is selected
and everything is done and dusted. There is no room for me to come in and add
"I am still
happy to contribute in my little way with the management of the team, but
nothing to do with the SLC. That's something I have told myself as well. I just
don't have the appetite to come and work for anybody when I know that it's not
the right place for me."
Jayawardene also criticised aspects of Anjelo Mathews' and Dinesh Chandima's leadership, whose failures he believes contributed to the rapid recent turnover of captains in the Sri Lanka side. Mathews was captain of all Sri Lanka's teams when Jayawardene retired in 2015, but since then, Chandimal, Thisara Perera, Lasith Malinga, Chamara Kapugedara and - most-recently - Dimuth Karunarathne have held the reins. This instability is understood to have contributed to Sri Lanka's serious decline in ODIs.
"The only advice [Kumar and I] gave Angelo was not to give in to cricket politics," Jayawardene said. "He needs to be a stronger leader, to be with the players and do the right thing. But he gave in to cricket politics. He allowed other people to make decisions and did not stand up for his players. I am being honest. I have told him this as well and he accepts it. If he hadn't give in, we would probably not be in this situation today. Even if I see him today, that's the only complaint I will have against him.
The number one rule in Sri Lanka is, if you are the captain, lead by example and do not allow any outsiders coming into that setup. That's the only way we ran the show and survived. It was unfortunate and it was not easy, either. You need to deal with a lot of unwanted elements. But if you are a strong character, that's something you have to do. I have nothing against him. He is a brilliant cricketer and a wonderful person but he did not handle this situation well. He should be the one who is leading this team at the World Cup. He had to give up because it was too much for him. But it was his fault.
"I think [Chandimal' was another victim of cricket politics. In the sense, he was another player like Angelo Mathews who was snared to elements behind the scene and went along with them rather than taking control of the team and being a strong leader."